AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Alien Cookies
vs Gelato #33

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Alien Cookies specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Alien Cookies ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Gelato #33 specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Gelato #33 ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference25%20%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reported0%
CBG · catalog reference1%Not reported
Dominant terpeneLimoneneCaryophyllene
TerpenesLimonene, Caryophyllene, MyrceneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene
AromaCitrus, Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbalPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsGSC (Reported parent), Alien Dawg (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentagePhenotype selection
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedGelato (Phenotype selection)
Lineage notesThe source uses Aliendawg for Alien Dawg. The cross is attributed to the catalog and awaits independent breeder documentation.Gelato #33 is a numbered selection from the Gelato family. Its family background is Sherbert with Thin Mint GSC; the selection link keeps it distinct from the general Gelato record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile113417

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Caryophyllene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 25% for Alien Cookies and 20% for Gelato #33. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →