AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Animal Face
vs Burmese Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Animal Face — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Animal Face ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Burmese Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Burmese Kush ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference30%25%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneCaryophyllene
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneCaryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spicePepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsFace Off OG (Reported parent), Animal Mints (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedOG Kush (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesThe cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.Only the OG Kush connection is explicit in the reviewed narrative. The complete cross remains unverified.
Source reports · whole profile214176

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 30% for Animal Face and 25% for Burmese Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →