AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

California Orange
vs Lemon Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified California Orange specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
California Orange ↗
Lemon Kush — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Lemon Kush ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference13%19%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneNot verified
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, PineneMyrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, PineEarthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedMaster Kush (Reported parent · disputed), Lemon Joy (Reported parent · disputed), Lemon G (Reported parent · disputed), Afghan Kush (Reported parent · disputed)
Lineage statusParents unknownDisputed parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesThe linked source describes the origin as mysterious. No parent edges are inferred from the orange name or later commercial versions.Lemon Kush has competing pedigrees: Master Kush with Lemon Joy, or the Alien Genetics version of Lemon G with Afghan Kush. These are alternatives, not a four-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile3781,276

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 13% for California Orange and 19% for Lemon Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →