AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Cinderella 99
vs Tangerine Dream

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Cinderella 99 specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Cinderella 99 ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Tangerine Dream specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Tangerine Dream ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedBarney’s Farm
THC · catalog reference18%20%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneLimoneneNot verified
TerpenesLimonene, Caryophyllene, MyrceneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaCitrus, Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbalEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage statusAncestry documentedAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsJack Herer (Ancestry component)G13 (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component), Neville’s A5 Haze (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesLeafly attributes the Jack Herer seed-origin account to Mr. Soul. The story does not establish a complete direct cross.Tangerine Dream is associated with Barney’s Farm. Its background lists G13, Afghani and Neville’s A5 Haze; the source does not specify each intermediate breeding step. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,2041,048

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Caryophyllene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 18% for Cinderella 99 and 20% for Tangerine Dream. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →