AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Face Off OG
vs Triangle Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Face Off OG specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Face Off OG ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Triangle Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Triangle Kush ↗
Classificationindicaindica
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference22%20%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneNot verified
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage statusPhenotype selectionParents unknown
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromOG Kush (Phenotype selection)Not verified
Lineage notesFace Off OG is associated with Archive Seeds and a California OG Kush selection from the late 1990s. This is represented as selection history rather than an invented two-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Triangle Kush is associated with Florida, with a name referring to Jacksonville, Miami and Tampa. This catalog records its regional history while leaving the immediate parent identities unresolved.
Source reports · whole profile195308

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 22% for Face Off OG and 20% for Triangle Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →