AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Gastro Pop
vs Gelato #33

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Gastro Pop specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Gastro Pop ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Gelato #33 specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Gelato #33 ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference26%20%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reported0%
CBG · catalog reference1%Not reported
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneCaryophyllene
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsApples and Bananas (Reported parent), Grape Gas (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentagePhenotype selection
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedGelato (Phenotype selection)
Lineage notesThe cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.Gelato #33 is a numbered selection from the Gelato family. Its family background is Sherbert with Thin Mint GSC; the selection link keeps it distinct from the general Gelato record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile107417

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 26% for Gastro Pop and 20% for Gelato #33. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →