AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Gelato #33
vs LA Kush Cake

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Gelato #33 specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Gelato #33 ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified LA Kush Cake specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
LA Kush Cake ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference20%23%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneLimonene
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneLimonene, Caryophyllene, Myrcene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalCitrus, Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsNot verifiedWedding Cake (Reported parent), Kush Mints (Reported parent)
Lineage statusPhenotype selectionReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromGelato (Phenotype selection)Not verified
Lineage notesGelato #33 is a numbered selection from the Gelato family. Its family background is Sherbert with Thin Mint GSC; the selection link keeps it distinct from the general Gelato record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.The cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.
Source reports · whole profile417275

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for Gelato #33 and 23% for LA Kush Cake. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →