AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Ghost Train Haze
vs Super Silver Haze

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Ghost Train Haze specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Ghost Train Haze ↗
Super Silver Haze — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Super Silver Haze ↗
Classificationsativasativa
BreederNot verifiedGreen House Seeds
THC · catalog reference19%21%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference2%1%
Dominant terpeneTerpinoleneMyrcene
TerpenesTerpinolene, Limonene, MyrceneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaHerbal, floral, Citrus, Earthy / herbalEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsGhost OG (Reported parent), Neville's Wreck (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedSkunk (unspecified) (Ancestry component), Northern Lights (Ancestry component), Haze (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesThe cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.Super Silver Haze is attributed to Green House Seeds and a background involving Skunk, Northern Lights and Haze. The source supplies those ancestry names but does not establish the exact sequence of crosses.
Source reports · whole profile1,2852,417

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 19% for Ghost Train Haze and 21% for Super Silver Haze. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →