SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Grapefruit
vs Harlequin
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Grapefruit source ↗Harlequin source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | sativa | sativa |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 19% | 5% |
| CBD · catalog reference | 0% | 9% |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Myrcene |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene | Myrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Pine | Earthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spice |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Cinderella 99 (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Colombian Gold (Ancestry component), Nepali indica (Ancestry component), Thai (Ancestry component), Swiss ancestry (Ancestry component) |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Grapefruit is reported as Cinderella 99 crossed with an unnamed sativa landrace. Leafly mentions both Nectar Seeds and Positronic Seeds, so no single breeder attribution is assigned here. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Colombian Gold, Nepali indica, Thai and Swiss landrace ancestry are reported. Immediate parents and crossing order are not specified. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 624 | 1,417 |
Explore Grapefruit family ↗Explore Harlequin family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 19% for Grapefruit and 5% for Harlequin. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.