AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Green Crack
vs Haze

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Green Crack — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Green Crack ↗
haze — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Haze ↗
Classificationsativasativa
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference17%18%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reported0%
CBG · catalog reference1%Not reported
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, PineneMyrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, PineEarthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsSkunk 1 (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedColombian ancestry (Ancestry component), Mexican ancestry (Ancestry component), Thai (Ancestry component), South Indian ancestry (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesGreen Crack also circulates as Green Crush and Mango Crack. Leafly identifies Skunk 1 in its background but leaves the other parent unnamed. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Leafly describes Colombian, Mexican, Thai and South Indian ancestry. This is a catalog account of regional ancestry, not a resolved direct-parent tree.
Source reports · whole profile7,078502

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 17% for Green Crack and 18% for Haze. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →