AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Jack Herer
vs Jack the Ripper

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
jack herer — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Jack Herer ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Jack the Ripper specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Jack the Ripper ↗
Classificationsativasativa
BreederSensi SeedsSubcool’s The Dank
THC · catalog reference18%17%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneTerpinoleneTerpinolene
TerpenesTerpinolene, Caryophyllene, PineneTerpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene
AromaHerbal, floral, Pepper / spice, PineHerbal, floral, Earthy / herbal, Pine
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedJack's Cleaner (Reported parent), Space Queen (Reported parent)
Lineage statusAncestry documentedReported parentage
Ancestry componentsHaze (Ancestry component), Northern Lights #5 (Ancestry component), Shiva Skunk (Ancestry component)Not verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesThe reported construction combines a Haze hybrid with Northern Lights #5 × Shiva Skunk. These are ancestry components, not three equally direct parents.Jack the Ripper, or JTR, is reported as Jack’s Cleaner crossed with the Space Dude male selection of Space Queen. The catalog connects it with Subcool’s The Dank. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile5,157462

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Terpinolene, Pinene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 18% for Jack Herer and 17% for Jack the Ripper. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →