SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Jack the Ripper
vs Lemon Thai
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Jack the Ripper source ↗Lemon Thai source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | sativa | sativa |
| Breeder | Subcool’s The Dank | Dutch Flowers |
| THC · catalog reference | 17% | 22% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Terpinolene | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Terpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene | Terpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene |
| Aroma | Herbal, floral, Earthy / herbal, Pine | Herbal, floral, Earthy / herbal, Pine |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Jack's Cleaner (Reported parent), Space Queen (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Thai (Ancestry component), Hawaiian material (unspecified) (Ancestry component) |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Jack the Ripper, or JTR, is reported as Jack’s Cleaner crossed with the Space Dude male selection of Space Queen. The catalog connects it with Subcool’s The Dank. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Lemon Thai is attributed to Dutch Flowers and a cross involving Thai and Hawaiian material. The source does not establish the exact named Hawaiian parent, so the family view preserves that uncertainty. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 462 | 153 |
Explore Jack the Ripper family ↗Explore Lemon Thai family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Terpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 17% for Jack the Ripper and 22% for Lemon Thai. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

