SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Kosher Kush
vs Lemon OG
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Kosher Kush source ↗Lemon OG source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | indica | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 21% | 19% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Myrcene | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene | Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice | Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Not verified | Lemon Skunk (Reported parent), OG #18 (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Ancestry documented | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | OG Kush (Ancestry component) | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Kosher Kush began as a Los Angeles clone-only line and is associated with DNA Genetics. Leafly relates it to OG Kush without documenting a complete two-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Lemon OG is described as a cross of a Las Vegas Lemon Skunk selection and OG #18. The Lemon Skunk link identifies the family; the particular Las Vegas selection is not a separate catalog record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 1,082 | 567 |
Explore Kosher Kush family ↗Explore Lemon OG family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 21% for Kosher Kush and 19% for Lemon OG. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

