SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Lemon OG
vs Lemon Skunk
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Lemon OG source ↗Lemon Skunk source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | DNA Genetics |
| THC · catalog reference | 19% | 19% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Caryophyllene | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene | Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus | Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Lemon Skunk (Reported parent), OG #18 (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Lemon OG is described as a cross of a Las Vegas Lemon Skunk selection and OG #18. The Lemon Skunk link identifies the family; the particular Las Vegas selection is not a separate catalog record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Lemon Skunk is attributed to DNA Genetics and two selected Skunk phenotypes. The individual selections are not named, so this record does not invent separate parent identities. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 567 | 1,110 |
Explore Lemon OG family ↗Explore Lemon Skunk family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 19% for Lemon OG and 19% for Lemon Skunk. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

