AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Purple Thai
vs Tangerine Dream

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Purple Thai specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Purple Thai ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Tangerine Dream specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Tangerine Dream ↗
Classificationsativahybrid
BreederNot verifiedBarney’s Farm
THC · catalog reference17%20%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneNot verified
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, HumuleneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Woody, earthyEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsHighland Oaxacan Gold (Reported parent), Chocolate Thai (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedG13 (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component), Neville’s A5 Haze (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesHighland Oaxacan Gold remains a named external parent. The source-reported cross does not authenticate modern descendants.Tangerine Dream is associated with Barney’s Farm. Its background lists G13, Afghani and Neville’s A5 Haze; the source does not specify each intermediate breeding step. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile691,048

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 17% for Purple Thai and 20% for Tangerine Dream. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →