AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Stardawg
vs Tangerine Dream

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Stardawg specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Stardawg ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Tangerine Dream specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Tangerine Dream ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedBarney’s Farm
THC · catalog reference22%20%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneNot verified
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsTres Dawg (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsChemdawg (Ancestry component)G13 (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component), Neville’s A5 Haze (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesThe cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.Tangerine Dream is associated with Barney’s Farm. Its background lists G13, Afghani and Neville’s A5 Haze; the source does not specify each intermediate breeding step. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile8521,048

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 22% for Stardawg and 20% for Tangerine Dream. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →