SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Strawberry Diesel
vs Tangerine Dream
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Strawberry Diesel source ↗Tangerine Dream source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Barney’s Farm |
| THC · catalog reference | 19% | 20% |
| CBD · catalog reference | 0% | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Caryophyllene | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | NYC Diesel (Reported parent), Strawberry Cough (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | G13 (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component), Neville’s A5 Haze (Ancestry component) |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | NYC Diesel and Strawberry Cough are the parents stated in the linked source. Do not silently substitute another Sour Diesel line. | Tangerine Dream is associated with Barney’s Farm. Its background lists G13, Afghani and Neville’s A5 Haze; the source does not specify each intermediate breeding step. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 360 | 1,048 |
Explore Strawberry Diesel family ↗Explore Tangerine Dream family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 19% for Strawberry Diesel and 20% for Tangerine Dream. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.