AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Super Boof
vs Tangerine Dream

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Super Boof — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Super Boof ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Tangerine Dream specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Tangerine Dream ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedBarney’s Farm
THC · catalog reference26%20%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedNot verified
TerpenesNot verifiedMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaNot verifiedEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsBlack Cherry Punch (Reported parent), Tropicana Cookies (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedG13 (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component), Neville’s A5 Haze (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesLeafly reports Black Cherry Punch and Tropicana Cookies as parents; the catalog relationship is attributed rather than genetically authenticated.Tangerine Dream is associated with Barney’s Farm. Its background lists G13, Afghani and Neville’s A5 Haze; the source does not specify each intermediate breeding step. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile3731,048

Similarities

No shared chemical profile has been established in these records.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 26% for Super Boof and 20% for Tangerine Dream. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →