SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Super Boof
vs Tangerine Dream
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Super Boof source ↗Tangerine Dream source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Barney’s Farm |
| THC · catalog reference | 26% | 20% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Not verified | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Not verified | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | No sourced reports yet. | |
| Reported parents | Black Cherry Punch (Reported parent), Tropicana Cookies (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | G13 (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component), Neville’s A5 Haze (Ancestry component) |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Leafly reports Black Cherry Punch and Tropicana Cookies as parents; the catalog relationship is attributed rather than genetically authenticated. | Tangerine Dream is associated with Barney’s Farm. Its background lists G13, Afghani and Neville’s A5 Haze; the source does not specify each intermediate breeding step. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 373 | 1,048 |
Explore Super Boof family ↗Explore Tangerine Dream family ↗
Similarities
No shared chemical profile has been established in these records.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 26% for Super Boof and 20% for Tangerine Dream. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

