SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Super Silver Haze
vs Tangerine Dream
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Super Silver Haze source ↗Tangerine Dream source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | sativa | hybrid |
| Breeder | Green House Seeds | Barney’s Farm |
| THC · catalog reference | 21% | 20% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Myrcene | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Ancestry documented | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Skunk (unspecified) (Ancestry component), Northern Lights (Ancestry component), Haze (Ancestry component) | G13 (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component), Neville’s A5 Haze (Ancestry component) |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Super Silver Haze is attributed to Green House Seeds and a background involving Skunk, Northern Lights and Haze. The source supplies those ancestry names but does not establish the exact sequence of crosses. | Tangerine Dream is associated with Barney’s Farm. Its background lists G13, Afghani and Neville’s A5 Haze; the source does not specify each intermediate breeding step. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 2,417 | 1,048 |
Explore Super Silver Haze family ↗Explore Tangerine Dream family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 21% for Super Silver Haze and 20% for Tangerine Dream. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.