AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Jack the Ripper
vs Trainwreck

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Jack the Ripper specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Jack the Ripper ↗
Trainwreck — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Trainwreck ↗
Classificationsativahybrid
BreederSubcool’s The DankNot verified
THC · catalog reference17%17%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneTerpinoleneTerpinolene
TerpenesTerpinolene, Myrcene, PineneTerpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene
AromaHerbal, floral, Earthy / herbal, PineHerbal, floral, Earthy / herbal, Pine
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsJack's Cleaner (Reported parent), Space Queen (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedMexican ancestry (Ancestry component), Thai (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesJack the Ripper, or JTR, is reported as Jack’s Cleaner crossed with the Space Dude male selection of Space Queen. The catalog connects it with Subcool’s The Dank. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Trainwreck is associated with Northern California and a mixed Mexican, Thai and Afghan background. Its family record keeps those regional contributions distinct from a verified immediate parent pair.
Source reports · whole profile4623,234

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Terpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 17% for Jack the Ripper and 17% for Trainwreck. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →