AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

SFV OG
vs Wedding Crasher

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
SFV OG — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
SFV OG ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Wedding Crasher specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Wedding Crasher ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedSymbiotic Genetics
THC · catalog reference20%21%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedCaryophyllene
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spicePepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedWedding Cake (Reported parent), Purple Punch (Reported parent)
Lineage statusAncestry documentedReported parentage
Ancestry componentsOG Kush (Ancestry component)Not verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesSFV OG takes its name from California’s San Fernando Valley and is associated with Cali Connection. It belongs to the OG Kush family and differs from the later Afghani-crossed SFV OG Kush. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Wedding Crasher, also listed as Wedding Crashers, is associated with Symbiotic Genetics. Its reported parents are Wedding Cake and Purple Punch. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile987358

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for SFV OG and 21% for Wedding Crasher. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →