AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Larry OG
vs SFV OG

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Larry OG specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Larry OG ↗
SFV OG — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
SFV OG ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference20%20%
CBD · catalog reference0%0%
CBG · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedNot verified
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsOG Kush (Reported parent), SFV OG (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedOG Kush (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesLarry OG is associated with Orange County, California. Leafly reports OG Kush and SFV OG as its parents and records several Larry aliases for the same profile. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.SFV OG takes its name from California’s San Fernando Valley and is associated with Cali Connection. It belongs to the OG Kush family and differs from the later Afghani-crossed SFV OG Kush. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile829987

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for Larry OG and 20% for SFV OG. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →