SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Tangerine Dream
vs White Fire OG
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Tangerine Dream source ↗White Fire OG source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Barney’s Farm | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 20% | 22% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Myrcene |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene | Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus | Earthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | No sourced reports yet. | |
| Reported parents | Not verified | Fire OG (Reported parent), The White (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Ancestry documented | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | G13 (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component), Neville’s A5 Haze (Ancestry component) | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Tangerine Dream is associated with Barney’s Farm. Its background lists G13, Afghani and Neville’s A5 Haze; the source does not specify each intermediate breeding step. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | The cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 1,048 | 1,086 |
Explore Tangerine Dream family ↗Explore White Fire OG family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 20% for Tangerine Dream and 22% for White Fire OG. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

