Sour Bubble
Sour Bubble is described by Leafly as a B.O.G. Seeds line developed through repeated backcrossing with BOG Bubble. A single ancestry connection represents that account here. A simple family graph cannot express every generation of a backcross, so the description carries that limitation.
Ancestry documented · Explore family ↓Compare this strain ↗Effects & flavor notes.
Explore the words people use to describe Sour Bubble.
Reported effects
Subjective feelings described by readers.
These are subjective reports, not guaranteed effects or medical conclusions. The report total covers the whole profile; individual tag frequencies are unavailable.
How to read these reportsParents, origins & family
Ancestry documented
Leafly describes three backcrosses with BOG Bubble. One ancestry edge summarizes the account without inventing intermediate generations.
Reported ancestry
BOG BubbleOpen strain profileLeafly describes three backcrosses with BOG Bubble. One ancestry edge summarizes the account without inventing intermediate generations.
Leafly — Sour Bubble identity and lineage ↗Children & later selections 1
Sour DubbOpen strain profileUncertain source-reported relationship; see the profile lineage note for competing accounts.
Leafly — Sour Dubb identity and lineage ↗How to read these relationships
Parent links describe a reported cross. Ancestry components may be several generations back. A phenotype selection comes from a named line rather than a new two-parent cross. Disputed links retain the uncertainty of their source.
Names in this catalog open a strain profile. Other names open the reference describing the relationship. The family view shows the links currently documented here, not every known descendant.
Cannabinoid profile
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown.
Leafly source ↗ · Checked 2026-09-24Concentrations vary by sample. A cultivar name alone does not establish potency.
Terpenes & aroma
Catalog-listed terpenes. Dominance is shown only where the source states it; percentages are unavailable unless separately recorded.
Similar strains
Similarity uses catalog reference chemistry, reported attributes and lineage. Missing data is excluded; this is not an effects prediction.
Super Skunk is reported as a cross between Skunk #1 and Afghani. Those links connect it to two widely referenced families; the skunk and earthy flavor tags below describe reader observations rather than laboratory measurements.
Reported parentage ↗
Blue Moonshine is attributed by Leafly to DJ Short and described within the Blueberry family. The reviewed narrative does not set out a full parent cross. Its fruity reader descriptors and catalog values are retained without treating a family resemblance as proof of a direct pedigree.
Parents unknown ↗
Zoap is described in Leafly's catalog as a Rainbow Sherbet and Pink Guava cross associated with Deo Farms. The parent names remain source-attributed and are not silently merged with similarly named catalog strains.
Reported parentage ↗Compare with related strains
Choose another strain to compare →References & provenance
Editorial review pending. This public profile includes draft descriptions and attributed catalog information; source checks are not independent verification of every claim.
- Leafly — Sour Bubble identity and lineage
Leafly describes three backcrosses with BOG Bubble. One ancestry edge summarizes the account without inventing intermediate generations.
Accessed 2026-09-24 - Leafly — sour bubble catalog parameters
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Terpene names and documented order come from the catalog; concentrations are not supplied. Effects, flavors and negative effects are reader-reported tags. The report count covers the profile as a whole, not individual tags.
Accessed 2026-09-24
Updated 2026-10-06 · Our editorial standards